Mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 34:14
הוא הדין דאפילו באמה ואיידי דתנא רישא אשתו שמתה מותר באחותה באחותה אין אבל באמה לא דהויא לה איסורא דאורייתא תנא נמי סיפא מותר באחותה
but that in the case of one<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who alone is entitled to marry her, ');"><sup>43</sup></span> a levirate bond does exist. Then let him say, 'The <i>halachah</i> is in accordance with him who said no levirate bond exists even in the case of one levir'!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Infra 29b. ');"><sup>44</sup></span> — If he had said so it might have been assumed even where she<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The widow. ');"><sup>45</sup></span> is alive;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Her mother is permitted to the levir. Consequently she would be exempted from halizah as 'his wife's daughter'. ');"><sup>46</sup></span>
Explore mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 34:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.